Movie Monday: ‘Backrooms’ Astounds at the Box Office

movie monday

All those backrooms in Backrooms can now serve a purpose beyond just being uncanny and creepy. They’ll be a great place to store all of the movie’s money.

A24’s Backrooms—directed by 20-year-old Kane Parsons and predicated on his wildly popular, deeply unsettling web series—absolutely blew the hidden doors off expectations. The R-rated horror flick gobbled up an estimated $81.5 million in North America during its first weekend of work, beyond even the most optimistic of prognostications. Add the $36.5 million it earned overseas and Backrooms already boasts $118 million in earnings—earnings that perhaps it can stuff in some of those backroom couches.

Also worth noting: A24 spent a measly $10 million making the thing, which means that the movie’s makers already have made plenty of profit. (Might I suggest using it to fix up those backrooms a bit.  Some nice wood floors, some shiplap … its hungry inhabitants would surely appreciate it.)

Backrooms’ success and profitability may also mark a turning point in the movie industry itself—the same sort of shift that Star Wars arguably set in motion 49 years ago. If Star Wars (now known as Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope) ushered in the age of the blockbuster, Backrooms may help usher in a new era powered by YouTube.

Backrooms is joined in that vanguard by Obsession, another R-rated horror film from a director best known for his work on YouTube. In this case, it’s 26-year-old Curry Barker, who reportedly made Obsession on a $750,000 budget. Obsession was the talk of Hollywood when it earned $17.2 million in North America in its debut, May 14-16. But while most movies hemorrhage huge segments of their audience every weekend after release, Obsession has actually been growing: It earned $24 million during the traditional three-day frame last weekend and an estimated $26.4 million this weekend—good enough for a surprise second-place finish. The horror flick has now collected $104.8 million stateside and $148 million worldwide.

The fall of The Mandalorian and Grogu seems to put an exclamation point on this potential changing-of-the-guard narrative. Part of perhaps Hollywood’s most storied franchise, The Mandalorian and Grogu was picked by many to be the weekend’s box office winner—a win it needed, given its reported $165 million budget. Instead, the film lost nearly 70% of its audience and earned just $25 million stateside—falling all the way to third place. Shocking? Perhaps. But in Hollywood’s ever-changing business climate, this is the way.

Michael stubbornly keeps moonwalking into the top five. It earned $11.7 million this weekend, pushing its domestic total to $339.9 million and its worldwide gross to a staggering $846.3 million. Not bad at all.

Another newcomer, The Breadwinner, closes out the top five with a $7.5 million weekend. That’s a bit below what experts had predicted, and that does not bode well for Nate Bargatze’s sweet PG comedy.

The World War II drama Pressure suffered a stormy debut, banking less than $5.8 million to finish seventh (behind The Devil Wears Prada 2 and its $5.9 million).

Paul Asay

Paul Asay has been part of the Plugged In staff since 2007, watching and reviewing roughly 15 quintillion movies and television shows. He’s written for a number of other publications, too, including Time, The Washington Post and Christianity Today. The author of several books, Paul loves to find spirituality in unexpected places, including popular entertainment, and he loves all things superhero. His vices include James Bond films, Mountain Dew and terrible B-grade movies. He’s married, has two children and a neurotic dog, runs marathons on occasion and hopes to someday own his own tuxedo. Feel free to follow him on Twitter @AsayPaul.

11 Responses

  1. Different topic but since y’all are probably reviewing “007: First Light” from IO Interactive (the “Hitman” developers), I figured you guys were going to get a million questions from parents or teens about the latter series. While it’s one of the spinoffs, I’d heartily recommend “Hitman Go,” a bloodless single-player, turn-based board game, which takes place in the same universe but focuses more on strategy than mess.

    I really liked the Star Wars movie but won’t deny that it felt like two episodes of a TV series I didn’t watch, put together, one of which felt like a bounty-hunter show (very exciting) and the other of which felt like a survival show (very … slow, almost sentimental), and the pacing of the two didn’t match at all. The story felt so much like it was wrapping up after the first half that I thought, “Huh, is that it?” and almost got out of my motion seat before the second half started.

  2. It’s sad that 2 very dark and Satanic movies are making bank at the box office while something wholesome like Sheep Detectives didn’t do very well.

    1. What makes them “Satanic?” In any event, Sheep Detectives cost more than Obsession and Backrooms put together, many times over.

      1. Obsession is about a man summoning a demon to possess his girlfriend so he can use her for his own personal gratification, and there’s also apparently a monologue where Hansel and Gretal is turned into a story of inc*st. Backrooms is about being stalked by a demon. Even if in Backrooms the “good guys” win, the Spirit is gone when we consume this sort of media because light cannot dwell where darkness is.

  3. I agree with plugged ins review of Backrooms. Could have easily been pg13 if it weren’t for the profanity. The concept is captivating though. I’ve tried to take several “Liminal space” photos myself.

    Also, I think PluggedIn should review Euphoria and Heated Rivalry. Both shows are extremely explicit, but parents need to know what’s in it as too many kids are into the shows as everyone is talking about them.

    1. PluggedIn HAS given “Euphoria” a very negative review. They have not reviewed “Heated Rivalry,” though I’m not sure why they would even want to. As for “Backrooms,” I watched it yesterday, and I have to agree with you, the movie could have gotten away with a PG-13 rating (and thereby gotten a bigger audience) had it not been for the foul language. I found the movie to be tremendously creepy but also very puzzling, and the director is being rather cagey about how it all should be interpreted. 8 out of 10 stars for atmosphere alone.

      1. Well not the new season of Euphoria. Plugged in usualy updates tv reviews when a new season comes out. I’ve heard the third one is the most explicit.

        1. That usually depends on IP, and in this case, I wouldn’t be surprised if they simply no longer bothered. I made it through the first one and a half episodes of the first season before saying, “That is quite enough for me,” and anecdotally I’ve heard poor things about the aesthetic quality of this season anyway.

          1. Hi, Erik, Josiah and Chuck. FYI … for the moment, we’ve decided to pass on reviewing the new season of Euphoria–largely for the reasons you mentioned, Erik. It feels like the show–at least in terms of its content concerns–is a known entity now (even if those concerns are more, um, concerning this season). I’m not sure what more Plugged In can add to this particular party.

          2. Aparently the show ends very horrible with everyone dying in the end. It could have easily ended with hope but they chose destruction. The show will also be destructive to anyone viewing it. It honestly needs to be banned as the show has probably led to suicides and drug overdoses.

            My other question is why they didn’t review heated rivalry. It’s basically a gay porn show with a side of hockey, but I’ve heard many kids and teens are watching it because they like the storyline or like hockey. Plugged in dosent even have to watch it, they can put up an advisory against it, just like they did with Hulu’s Fire Island

      2. If PluggedIn hasn’t reviewed something I use IMDB’s parents guide. I used to use CommonSenseMedia but you only get 3 free reviews a month and they’ve become super pro LGBT now, so…..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *