Plugged In exists to shine a light on the world of popular entertainment while giving you and your family the essential tools you need to understand, navigate and impact the culture in which we live. Through reviews, articles and discussions, we want to spark intellectual thought, spiritual growth and a desire to follow the command of Colossians 2:8: "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ."


Family uses Plugged In as a ‘significant compass’

"I am at a loss for words to adequately express how much it means to my husband and me to know that there is an organization like Focus that is rooting for us. Just today I was reading Psalm 37 and thinking about how your ministry provides ways to 'dwell in the land and enjoy safe pasture.' We have two teenagers and an 8-year-old in our household...Plugged In has become a significant compass for our family. All three of our kids are dedicated to their walk with Christ but they still encounter challenges. Thanks for all of your research and persistence in helping us navigate through stormy waters."

Plugged In helps college student stand-up for his belief

"Thanks for the great job you do in posting movie and television reviews online. I’m a college freshman and I recently had a confrontational disagreement with my English professor regarding an R-rated film. It is her favorite movie and she wanted to show it in class. I went to your Web site to research the film’s content. Although I had not seen the movie myself, I was able to make an educated argument against it based on the concerns you outlined. The prof said that she was impressed by my stand and decided to poll the whole class and give us a choice. We overwhelmingly voted to watch a G-rated movie instead! I’ve learned that I can trust your site and I will be using it a lot in the future.”

Plugged In brings ‘Sanity and Order’ to Non-believer

“Even though I don’t consider myself a Christian, I find your Plugged In Web site useful and thought-provoking. No one reviews movies like you do. Instead of being judgmental, you put entertainment ‘on trial.’ After presenting the evidence, you allow the jury of your readers to decide for themselves what they should do. In my opinion, you bring sanity and order to the wild world of modern day entertainment. Keep up the good work!”

Mom thinks Plugged In is the ‘BEST Christian media review site’

"Our family doesn't go to the movies until we go online and check out your assessment of a given film. I think this is the BEST Christian media review website that I've found, and I recommend it to my family and friends. Keep up the good work!"


Our hope is that whether you're a parent, youth leader or teen, the information and tools at Plugged In will help you and your family make appropriate media decisions. We are privileged to do the work we do, and are continually thankful for the generosity and support from you, our loyal readers, listeners and friends.


Watch This Review

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Movie Review

What makes us human? What makes us special? What makes our life … life?

Perhaps it's best not to ask. Not in the world of 2049, where the line between man and machine is so very, very thin.

Replicants—engineered human facsimiles—populate this era, both on-world and off. They're different than they used to be. So its makers say, anyway. They're more "human" than ever, thanks to implanted memories. But they're more malleable, too. They've been designed to obey implicitly, eliminating the wayward tendencies of earlier models. They live to obey. But do they live in truth?

Some earlier replicants run on as well—if, that is, they've run away. But they're seen as threats to the natural order of things, which keeps blade runners like K employed.

K's job, like that of all blade runners, is to hunt down rogue replicants and "retire" them. It's not murder, of course. Never mind that they fight and bleed and sometimes beg to live. These replicants are human-like constructs, and no more—a clever blend of sophisticated machine and fabricated memory and one whopper of a motherboard.

K knows this. He accepts it. If he didn't, the reality of his job might well drive him mad.

But then, after he "retires" a grub farmer, K runs across evidence of something else, something that calls into question who lives and who does not.

What makes life life? What makes humans human?

For K, such musings are no existentialist pastime. They have urgent relevance. But they trigger, perhaps, an even more immediate question.

Dare he ask it?

Positive Elements

K seems to be a good man, for the most part. He doesn't relish the messy parts of his job. And he even shows a certain respect and courtesy to the replicants he "retires." And even though his immediate goals change during the course of the film, his overarching goal—to do what he thinks is right—consistently guides him.

K is also quite loyal to Joi, his significant other. Despite many a temptation that parades by, he stays true to her as much as he can.

He also meets Rick Deckard, a blade runner from decades (and another movie) ago. The two don't get along right away. But each risks his respective life for each other. And both seem willing to sacrifice for a higher cause.

Spiritual Content

When you ask questions about what makes us human and special, you wade into some inherently deep spiritual waters. Blade Runner 2049 certainly does that, with K at one point even pondering when people—or replicants—are imbued with a soul. And before K takes down the grub farmer, the man tells him that K's only willing to retire replicants "because you've never seen a miracle."

Little wonder, then, that Niander Wallace, the head of the organization that makes replicants these days, casts himself as something of a God-like figure, someone capable of creating "life" who also has the moral authority to destroy that life whenever he sees fit. "We made angels in the service of civilization," he says. When Wallace talks about a very special replicant from the not-so-distant past, he echoes the kind of language we hear in Scripture, saying that "God remembered" the replicant and "healed her." And when he inspects a new "model," he greets her in similarly biblical terms. "An angel should never enter the kingdom of heaven without a gift," he says.

Sexual Content

That new model, by the way, is completely nude when we see her—and we see plenty of her, including her breasts and backside. Wallace also places his hand where the replicant's womb would be. We see another woman nude as well: a pink-haired but very real gigantic hologram that tries to seduce passers-by to buy "her". ("Everything you want to see," reads the advertising copy. "Everything you want to hear.") Her breasts and backside are again visible.

K walks by some mostly formed replicants floating in vats of liquid, all of whom are obviously naked. (We see male genitals on some.) Statues of gigantic, naked women are scattered about a surreal cityscape.

Women and replicants constantly hit on K. And a trio of apparent prostitutes walk over to a table K sits at and flirt with him. Two leave once they discover he's a blade runner, but one stays, continuing to chat him up. But he turns her down, too. K's boss, Lt. Joshi, also asks suggestively what might happen once she finishes her drink in K's apartment. (K demurs, telling her about all the work he should catch up on.)

K does eventually have a sexual encounter: We see the object of his desire remove her clothes (he gets an eyeful, but we don't), and the two embrace. The camera leaves shortly thereafter, but returns to glimpse an awkward morning after.

Wallace's replicant servant, Luv, says that being asked personal questions makes her feel "desire." We see some women dressed in showgirl outfits and other revealing garb.

Violent Content

While "retiring" replicants isn't considered murder in this dystopian future, it sure looks like it. Thus, I won't make any distinction between human and replicant here.

A naked woman is slashed through the stomach with a knife, bleeding out as two people look on. Another woman, this one clothed, is similarly killed. A third is shot almost point-blank in the head, accompanied by a spray of blood and gore. K shoots several people in the head and snaps someone's back. Perhaps a dozen others are killed via some sort of war drone. A massive melee leads to someone drowning. Someone else gets smashed in the back of the head, and the victim dies with blood spurting out of his mouth and floating in his eyeballs.

Speaking of eyeballs, K removes one from a deceased replicant (eyeballs contain replicant serial numbers) and takes it back to the office to be logged. We don't see the eye's removal, but we do see it in a bloody bag. K also gets into some serious fights that lead to his face being caked with blood. (He drools blood out of his mouth on occasion, too). K punches someone in the face, too, leading to a bloody and perhaps broken nose. A child is beaten by a bunch of bullies.

Flying cars crash. Replicants smash through walls. Explosions explode. People fly back. We hear someone threaten to torture someone else. There's talk of dissecting replicants.

Crude or Profane Language

Seven f-words, three s-words and a smattering of other profanities, including "b--tard," "h---" and "pr--k." God's name is paired with "d--n," loudly, once.

Drug and Alcohol Content

K smokes, and we see him light up often. He serves himself and Joi drinks of some kind. Lt. Joshi downs an alcoholic beverage at K's house as well. An old-fashioned bar features hundreds of old liquor bottles stacked in rather artistic fashions. Deckard offers K a glass of whiskey. "Got millions of bottles of whiskey," he says. He also pours some on the floor for his dog to lap up.

Other Negative Elements

K comes across a bevy of children working—essentially as slaves—in a massive trash collection plant. Their taskmaster tells K that he does let them play (perhaps a lie), but rationalizes that "the work … molds them into a child worth having." And then he offers to sell/loan one to K, though for what is never articulated. "What child you have in mind?" he says. "I got all kinds."

We see the interior of an unused casino, and someone absently plays with a roulette wheel.


Blade Runner 2049 is a ticklish movie to review for a whole host of reasons—and not just because everything that happens after the first five minutes is pretty much a spoiler. It's that the film, in a way, resembles its own version of dystopian Los Angeles: It offers some remarkable creations, yet it's stuck in a world of trash and squallor.

First, the good:

It's a rare sequel that compares to the original. Most tend to be pallid imitations—unconvincing replicants, if you will—of the source material, drained of the vibrancy seen before. And given that Ridley Scott's original Blade Runner is now considered a science fiction masterpiece, the bar for 2049 was set particularly high.

And yet, this replicant—directed by Arrival's Denis Villeneuve—is full of life. Beautifully shot and expertly acted, Blade Runner 2049 pumps blood into this dystopian world. Like the original Blade Runner, it encourages us to ask big questions that may even challenge our faith in interesting, ultimately healthy ways. And even if every plot twist doesn't hold up to scrutiny, it still feels like a well-crafted work that, if not quite the equal of its predecessor, certainly doesn't embarrass it.

But let me remind you, that predecessor was also rated R. And both films are so branded for a host of obvious reasons.

Both Blade Runner films lead us into an unseemly, seedy milieu in which humanity's worst impulses have been augmented and magnified by technology. As saturated as our culture is with sex, this gloomy version of Los Angeles is even more so—a distraction in a world so bleak as to be almost barren of pleasure. If life can sometimes feel cheap now, it feels much more so here, filled with literally disposable "people" who serve as so much fodder for civilization's grinding machinery.

To see such a world is hard on both eye and soul. And that's part of the point. But that doesn't make it any easier, any more edifying. The original Blade Runner, from 1982, is hard enough to watch. This sequel—given the more advanced graphic tools at its makers' disposal, and given that it's been created in (arguably) a more permissive culture—is more problematic than the original.

Perhaps far more.

Pro-social Content

Objectionable Content

Summary Advisory

Plot Summary

Christian Beliefs

Other Belief Systems

Authority Roles



Discussion Topics

Additional Comments/Notes

Episode Reviews



Readability Age Range



Ryan Gosling as K; Ana de Armas as Joi; Sylvia Hoeks as Luv; Harrison Ford as Rick Deckard; Dave Bautista as Sapper Morton; Robin Wright as Lieutenant Joshi; Jared Leto as Niander Wallace


Denis Villeneuve ( )


Sony, Warner Bros.



Record Label



In Theaters

October 6, 2017

On Video

January 16, 2018

Year Published



Paul Asay

Content Caution

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Get weekly e-news, Culture Clips & more!