Plugged In exists to shine a light on the world of popular entertainment while giving you and your family the essential tools you need to understand, navigate and impact the culture in which we live. Through reviews, articles and discussions, we want to spark intellectual thought, spiritual growth and a desire to follow the command of Colossians 2:8: "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ."


Family uses Plugged In as a ‘significant compass’

"I am at a loss for words to adequately express how much it means to my husband and me to know that there is an organization like Focus that is rooting for us. Just today I was reading Psalm 37 and thinking about how your ministry provides ways to 'dwell in the land and enjoy safe pasture.' We have two teenagers and an 8-year-old in our household...Plugged In has become a significant compass for our family. All three of our kids are dedicated to their walk with Christ but they still encounter challenges. Thanks for all of your research and persistence in helping us navigate through stormy waters."

Plugged In helps college student stand-up for his belief

"Thanks for the great job you do in posting movie and television reviews online. I’m a college freshman and I recently had a confrontational disagreement with my English professor regarding an R-rated film. It is her favorite movie and she wanted to show it in class. I went to your Web site to research the film’s content. Although I had not seen the movie myself, I was able to make an educated argument against it based on the concerns you outlined. The prof said that she was impressed by my stand and decided to poll the whole class and give us a choice. We overwhelmingly voted to watch a G-rated movie instead! I’ve learned that I can trust your site and I will be using it a lot in the future.”

Plugged In brings ‘Sanity and Order’ to Non-believer

“Even though I don’t consider myself a Christian, I find your Plugged In Web site useful and thought-provoking. No one reviews movies like you do. Instead of being judgmental, you put entertainment ‘on trial.’ After presenting the evidence, you allow the jury of your readers to decide for themselves what they should do. In my opinion, you bring sanity and order to the wild world of modern day entertainment. Keep up the good work!”

Mom thinks Plugged In is the ‘BEST Christian media review site’

"Our family doesn't go to the movies until we go online and check out your assessment of a given film. I think this is the BEST Christian media review website that I've found, and I recommend it to my family and friends. Keep up the good work!"


Our hope is that whether you're a parent, youth leader or teen, the information and tools at Plugged In will help you and your family make appropriate media decisions. We are privileged to do the work we do, and are continually thankful for the generosity and support from you, our loyal readers, listeners and friends.

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

TV Series Review

In 1990, ABC unveiled a curious little show called Twin Peaks. Critics loved it. Practically no one else watched it. It lasted just two seasons—a little more than a year—before it was axed due to low ratings.

But in its death throes, it gave birth to television as we know it today.

Twin Peaks began when television was made for the masses. It was the age of Roseanne and The Golden Girls, Matlock and Major Dad. Twin Peaks, the brainchild of television vet Mike Frost and surrealist director David Lynch, was nothing like those shows. Nothing like any show. It was a telegenic fever dream—a serialized mystery with super-quirky characters, supernatural undertones and an offbeat vibe that left viewers uncertain whether they should laugh or scream. The series rewarded obsessive viewing and inspired couch-born analysts to discuss and dissect every outlandish turn of events.

In a television landscape full of broadly appealing comedies and inoffensive dramas, Twin Peaks was a cult show—and one that made no pretension of being anything else.

And then it was gone. Only—like Laura Palmer, the murdered woman at the center of Twin Peaks' first mystery—not. It spawned a slew of imitators: Northern Exposure copied its quirk. The X-Files replicated the show's freaky-creepy vibe and, to some extent, its serialization. And those series in turn spawned their own imitators. Now, it seems, every show—or, at least, every show we talk about—is a cult show on some level. From Game of Thrones to Stranger Things, from American Gods to American Horror Story, today's prestige television is built on the foundation laid by Twin Peaks.

Perhaps it's fitting, then, that Twin Peaks is back (on Showtime), more than 25 years after Laura Palmer's murder was solved. But given that today's television landscape was shaped by the landmark show, is it even possible for the sequel to feel as freaky, as unhinged as the original?

Answer: yes. Boy howdy, yes.

My Log Saw Something That Night …

When Twin Peaks aired its last episode in 1991, the dashing-yet-dour FBI agent Dale Cooper had been possessed by the spirit of Killer Bob, a sadistic, demonic entity who inhabits various innocent hosts and, through one such host, killed Laura Palmer (and perpetrated plenty of other vile deeds besides).

Showtime's Twin Peaks picks up 25 years later. Cooper's body is still thrall to Killer Bob, while Cooper's consciousness is trapped in what's called the Black Lodge—an extradimensional reality featuring red curtains and a red-and-white zigzag floor.

And that, I'm afraid, is the most sensical paragraph you're likely to get here.

Killer Bob's supposed to be sent back to the Black Lodge, but the spirit doesn't particularly want to go. So he's plotting to keep Cooper's body in his evil clutches. Meanwhile, Cooper's consciousness chats with a variety of spectral entities, including the dead Laura Palmer (who removes her face to reveal a blinding light) and a small talking tree with some sort of odd, pulsing growth on it.

Also meanwhile, there have been a couple of murders committed in Buckhorn, S.D.: the local librarian and an as-of-yet unidentified man. He's yet to be identified, in part, because the man's naked body was found in bed with the librarian's severed head. The town's high school principal has been implicated, but he swears he had nothing to do with either of the murders.

Also, also meanwhile, there's a super-secret glass box in New York City that occasionally contains extra-dimensional beings. And a casino tycoon in Las Vegas seems to be under the thumb of an as-of-yet-unnamed authority. Laura Palmer's mother watches violent nature documentaries. The Log Lady's log is having visions again. Someone's buying shovels.

Mairzy Doats and Dozy Doats and Liddle Lamzy Divey …

Know what's going on yet? No? That's partly the point. Lynch, the mastermind behind the vibe of both the original and rebooted iterations, relishes jarring visuals and dissonant plotting and flat-out mystery. Indeed, if Lynch had had his way, Laura Palmer's killer wouldn't have been found so early in the series. He might never have been found.

"I don't think that people accept the fact that life doesn't make sense," Lynch was quoted in My Love Affair with David Lynch and Peachy Like Nietzsche: Dark Clown Porn Snuff for Terrorists and Gorefiends. "I think it makes people terribly uncomfortable. It seems like religion and myth were invented against that, trying to make sense out of it."

And while the original Twin Peaks was plenty jarring back in the day, the Showtime version—free of any network constraints—ratchets up the content something fierce.

We're exposed to intense moments of nudity, violence and language. The violence against women can be particularly shocking and, Lynch plays that card again and again.

The violence and sex isn't as pervasive as on, say, American Gods or Game of Thrones. But In some ways, that makes it all the more dissonant: You can never be quite sure whether a conversation will end with a surreal bon mot or someone's head rolling around on the floor.

Twin Peaks, the new version, has reclaimed its long-dormant crown as the strangest show on television. And while its resurrection may be a dream come true for fans of the original, the content we see can be the stuff of nightmare, right out of the Black Lodge itself.

Positive Elements

Spiritual Content

Sexual Content

Violent Content

Crude or Profane Language

Drug and Alcohol Content

Other Negative Elements


Pro-social Content

Objectionable Content

Summary Advisory

Plot Summary

Christian Beliefs

Other Belief Systems

Authority Roles



Discussion Topics

Additional Comments/Notes

Episode Reviews

Twin Peaks: May 21, 2017 "The Return: Part 1 and 2"



Readability Age Range



Kyle MacLachlan as Dale Cooper; Sheryl Lee as Laura Palmer; Kimmy Robertson as Lucy Moran; Russ Tamblyn as Dr. Lawrence Jacoby; Mädchen Amick as Shelly Johnson; Dana Ashbrook as Bobby Briggs; Ray Wise as Leland Palmer; Grace Zabriskie as Sarah Palmer; Everett McGill as Big Ed Hurley






Record Label




On Video

Year Published



Paul Asay

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Get weekly e-news, Culture Clips & more!