WHY WE CARE


YOUR STORIES


SUPPORT THE WORK OF PLUGGED IN

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

TV Series Review

What are we to make of MTV's Skins? More to the point, what are we to say about America's version of a British serial that hasn't already been said? How are we to restrain ourselves from overusing exclamation points as we describe its excesses?

That last one may be the hardest since Skins itself is an exclamation point on television programming—an emphatic statement full of noise and heat and bluster, a scream without sense, a yawp without warning. And when we hear such a shout, the temptation is to yell back.

Should we succumb?

The skins of the title serves as a double entendre, referencing both the bare skin on frequent display and the paper used to roll joints. The series centers on high schoolers engaged in a dizzying array of bad behaviors, from sex to drugs to deceit. Tony, the ringleader with a choir-boy face and a bad-boy swagger, torments his father and preys on his classmates like a smirking demon. Goofball friend Stanley obsesses over his porn collection. Chris makes crass come-ons to his appreciative social sciences teacher. Cadie embalms her dead hamster and hangs it from the ceiling. Oh, and she'll sleep with anyone if they'll bring her drugs. By comparison, Tea, a promiscuous, self-possessed lesbian cheerleader, practically qualifies as a role model.

Teens disrobe whenever convenient, smoke pot whenever possible and swear as much as the censors allow. Used occasionally, the f-word is bleeped. The same cannot be said of the s-word, or any of the other frequent profanities, or the crude monikers for various body parts, or the slew of sexual allusions.

But beyond this kind of extreme content (which really wouldn't even raise eyebrows over at Spike or FX these days), what sets Skins apart is its ethos. Plugged In has been critical of such shows as  Gossip Girl and  Melrose Place for being unnecessarily salacious, but we've observed that all that bad behavior sometimes invokes something more interesting—sometimes even akin to a positive lesson or two. On Skins, bad behavior is the message. Because even though we see hints that, underneath all the sex and drugs and cheap laughs, this is really a tragedy masked, it's buried so deep that by the time its voice surfaces, we can barely hear the whisper.

And that's why, before it even aired, the Parents Television Council declared Skins "the most dangerous program that has ever been foisted on your children!"

MTV seems to agree.

"Back in 2008, The CW network rolled out a controversial 'OMFG' ad campaign for its series, Gossip Girl," writes Lisa Chudnofsky on the network's Remote Control Blog. "Parents and religious groups were up in arms over its scandalous posters, which featured half-nekkid Upper East Siders, mid-hookup, and looking pretty excited about it. The images were raunchy, but we can't exactly judge—if MTV were to put up a billboard that encapsulates its provocative new series, Skins, it might … say something like 'OMFG. No Really, OMFFFFFG!'"

Or, put more succinctly by Hank Stuever in The Washington Post, "By and large, Skins is a repugnant, irredeemably nihilistic viewing experience for grownups—the very thing for which 'off' buttons are made."

Perhaps, though, it's the "Defamer" on gawker.com who best captured what I found especially bothersome about the show by nailing down the idea that Skins defames the very people it's supposed to attract: "[It] present[s] the thesis that kids really are as adults supposedly see them—messy jumbles of extremes with very little shading in between, lacking in kindness, decorum, and any sense of responsibility or consequence. It's a pretty bleak and unfair characterization. Teenagers are dumb, yes, but they're not monsters. … I wish television and movies would stop trying to tell us they are."

Of course, if you know anything about the public life of teenagers, you know that even these teens aren't monsters. They're just kids who desperately need help. But on Skins, there's no help coming. And that makes this series the most depressing teen fantasy we've ever laid eyes on. It depicts adults as moronic and ineffectual, even though polls suggest that teens actually see the adults in their lives as positive influences and "family" as paramount. And while the kids on Skins live for the next party, today's youth are working harder than ever at school and plotting out their college course load and future careers. Studies suggest that for real teens sexual promiscuity and overall drug use may have actually gone down over the last decade, while responsibility and charity have gone up.

Not that Skins will ever breathe a word of that. This show stubbornly stays true to its ringleader, Tony, manipulating its viewers and leading them into a world both repulsive and unreal.

Positive Elements

Spiritual Content

Sexual Content

Violent Content

Crude or Profane Language

Drug and Alcohol Content

Other Negative Elements

Conclusion

Pro-social Content

Objectionable Content

Summary Advisory

Plot Summary

Christian Beliefs

Other Belief Systems

Authority Roles

Profanity/Violence

Kissing/Sex/Homosexuality

Discussion Topics

Additional Comments/Notes

Episode Reviews

Skins: 1312011
Skins: 1242011
Skins: 1172011

Credits

Rating

Readability Age Range

Author

Cast

James Newman as Tony; Daniel Flaherty as Stanley; Rachel Thevenard as Michelle; Britne Oldford as Cadie; Sofia Black-D'Elia as Tea; Jesse Carere as Chris; Camille Cresencia-Mills as Daisy; Ron Mustafaa as Abbud; Eleanor Zichy as Eura

Director

Distributor

Network

MTV

Performance

Record Label

Platform

Publisher

Released

On Video

Year Published

Awards

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Get weekly e-news, Culture Clips & more!