WHY WE CARE


Plugged In exists to shine a light on the world of popular entertainment while giving you and your family the essential tools you need to understand, navigate and impact the culture in which we live. Through reviews, articles and discussions, we want to spark intellectual thought, spiritual growth and a desire to follow the command of Colossians 2:8: "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ."

YOUR STORIES


Family uses Plugged In as a ‘significant compass’

"I am at a loss for words to adequately express how much it means to my husband and me to know that there is an organization like Focus that is rooting for us. Just today I was reading Psalm 37 and thinking about how your ministry provides ways to 'dwell in the land and enjoy safe pasture.' We have two teenagers and an 8-year-old in our household...Plugged In has become a significant compass for our family. All three of our kids are dedicated to their walk with Christ but they still encounter challenges. Thanks for all of your research and persistence in helping us navigate through stormy waters."

Plugged In helps college student stand-up for his belief

"Thanks for the great job you do in posting movie and television reviews online. I’m a college freshman and I recently had a confrontational disagreement with my English professor regarding an R-rated film. It is her favorite movie and she wanted to show it in class. I went to your Web site to research the film’s content. Although I had not seen the movie myself, I was able to make an educated argument against it based on the concerns you outlined. The prof said that she was impressed by my stand and decided to poll the whole class and give us a choice. We overwhelmingly voted to watch a G-rated movie instead! I’ve learned that I can trust your site and I will be using it a lot in the future.”

Plugged In brings ‘Sanity and Order’ to Non-believer

“Even though I don’t consider myself a Christian, I find your Plugged In Web site useful and thought-provoking. No one reviews movies like you do. Instead of being judgmental, you put entertainment ‘on trial.’ After presenting the evidence, you allow the jury of your readers to decide for themselves what they should do. In my opinion, you bring sanity and order to the wild world of modern day entertainment. Keep up the good work!”

Mom thinks Plugged In is the ‘BEST Christian media review site’

"Our family doesn't go to the movies until we go online and check out your assessment of a given film. I think this is the BEST Christian media review website that I've found, and I recommend it to my family and friends. Keep up the good work!"

SUPPORT THE WORK OF PLUGGED IN

Our hope is that whether you're a parent, youth leader or teen, the information and tools at Plugged In will help you and your family make appropriate media decisions. We are privileged to do the work we do, and are continually thankful for the generosity and support from you, our loyal readers, listeners and friends.

PLUGGED IN RATING

    No Rating Available

Watch This Review

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Movie Review

After a distinguished career with the Central Intelligence Agency, Nathan Muir is just one day away from retirement when he receives word that Tom Bishop, a long-time protégé, has been captured trying to rescue someone from a Chinese prison. Accused of espionage, Tom is scheduled to be executed in 24 hours. The CIA, due to political ramifications, has no intention of stepping in. The big question is, will Nathan resist the temptation to intervene on his own? Years earlier, the teacher had cautioned his pupil to stay on task, warning Tom, "If you go off the reservation, I will not come after you." He also taught Tom to put aside personal feelings and get the job done. He advocated sacrificing individuals for the greater good. It was Nathan who said operatives should never question instructions. We learn this from various memories of field work (portrayed in detailed flashbacks) that Nathan shares with colleagues after being dragged into a high-level meeting about the international incident.

Even so, something suggests that this case is different for the CIA vet. The details and back-story are kind of fuzzy for those of us sitting in the dark eating popcorn—not quite in range to be seen with clear focus. Who was Tom trying to free? Exactly what would inspire our government to sacrifice one of its own operatives? What caused an apparent rift between the two agents? Details unfold slowly and deliberately, not offering the audience any more information than necessary to connect with what’s happening onscreen at any given time. Yet there are hints of things to come. It’s an effective storytelling technique that helps to make Spy Game an intelligent thriller sure to be mentioned at Oscar time. [Spoiler Warning: The following content analysis necessitates alluding to some of the movie’s revelations.]

positive elements: Aid workers put themselves in harm’s way to provide medical attention to victims of war. Tom risks his own life to fulfill an order in Vietnam, then assists his wounded partner until they are picked up by an Allied chopper. Despite what Nathan says, Tom doesn’t feel right about leaving his "assets" (people naïvely used by agents in order to acquire information or accomplish the mission) hung out to dry. When a German man who trusted Tom gets trapped and murdered by authorities, Tom angrily confronts Nathan, arguing, "You don’t trade these people like baseball cards. We killed the man. We used him and we killed him." In fact, he’s so conflicted over years of such behavior that he eventually walks away from the whole game. A medical doctor recruited to help assassinate a despotic leader asks Tom, "Tell me, is it hard to take a life?" To which Tom—a successful sniper in Vietnam—admits, "Yeah." This sense of humanity and decency makes us care about Tom’s eventual fate. We also learn that his failed rescue attempt at the Chinese prison was motivated by sacrificial romantic love and the desire to right a wrong. Nathan, on the other hand, is sympathetic because we sense his genuine affection for Tom and regret over some professional decisions he has made. This incident is his shot at redemption. He may only have one day left with the CIA, but by putting his friend’s life ahead of "the system" at great personal cost, it will in some sense liberate him from a career of amoral deception and exploitation.

spiritual content: None except for a passing reference to Noah’s ark.

sexual content: Tom and Elizabeth are shown waking up together on two occasions, implying a sexual relationship outside of marriage. A Chinese businessman sits transfixed by the opening sequence of TV’s Baywatch (viewers see women in immodest swimwear). Still, the filmmakers display no nudity or sexual activity of any kind.

violent content: Lots of tension and conflict, but except for a quick dream sequence in which Nathan sees Tom shot in the head at close range (not overly graphic), the violence is quite restrained for an R-rated film. War-torn Vietnam (1975) and Beirut (1985) serve as backdrops in Tom and Nathan’s history together. With those settings come indiscriminate strafings of machine-gun fire and many wounded people. Lots of guns and hostile posturing. A suicide bomber drives a truck into a building, blowing up half a city block (just before it hits, the driver is shot through the windshield). Tom assassinates a Viet Cong leader with well-placed sniper fire, then cripples an enemy helicopter which proceeds to crash and burn. The Chinese torture Tom, beating him to within an inch of his life and leaving his face a bloodied mess. CIA officials refer to a woman having been beaten to death. To gain a doctor’s cooperation in assassinating an evil leader, Nathan produces photos of the man’s murdered parents (done in with carbon monoxide). The bloody aftermath of a street war is spread throughout a triage unit.

crude or profane language: Approximately 40 profanities, including 15 f-words and about 10 misuses of Jesus’ name.

drug and alcohol content: Nathan is partial to Scotch, and is seen drinking it on several occasions. A couple shares wine with a meal. Tom ingests a white powder in order to make himself vomit. He takes pills just before intentionally electrocuting himself as part of a scam, and is revived with an injection of a drug. A number of characters smoke cigarettes.

other negative elements: Noble ends frequently justify immoral means (murder, theft, lies, forgery, etc.).

conclusion: There’s a lot to like about this engagingly written, visually arresting thriller. It neither confuses, nor condescends. Audiences are transported to convincing foreign settings. An unpredictable cat-and-mouse game between Nathan and his peers kept me guessing. Flawed, yet sympathetic heroes made me care about their fates—and the fate of their friendship (Pitt and Redford share terrific chemistry). Challenging moral dilemmas will give mature viewers plenty to mull over after the lights come up. The film also benefits from a delicate emotional ebb and flow, and when Scott ratchets up the tension, he does so with just the right amount of torque. The war violence will push some families away, but the real problem here is profanity. Had they taken the language down a notch, Spy Game would have been a worthwhile flick for mature viewers willing to analyze its weighty themes from a biblical perspective.

Advertisement

Positive Elements

Spiritual Content

Sexual Content

Violent Content

Crude or Profane Language

Drug and Alcohol Content

Other Negative Elements

Conclusion

Pro-social Content

Objectionable Content

Summary Advisory

Plot Summary

Christian Beliefs

Other Belief Systems

Authority Roles

Profanity/Violence

Kissing/Sex/Homosexuality

Discussion Topics

Additional Comments/Notes

Episode Reviews

Credits

Rating

R

Readability Age Range

Author

Cast

Robert Redford as Nathan Muir; Brad Pitt as Tom Bishop; Catherine McCormack as Elizabeth Hadley; Stephen Dillane as Charles Harker; Larry Bryggman as Troy Folger; Marianne Jean-Baptiste as Gladys

Distributor

Universal Pictures

Network

Performance

Record Label

Platform

Publisher

In Theaters

On Video

Year Published

Awards

Reviewer

Bob Smithouser

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Get weekly e-news, Culture Clips & more!