WHY WE CARE


Plugged In exists to shine a light on the world of popular entertainment while giving you and your family the essential tools you need to understand, navigate and impact the culture in which we live. Through reviews, articles and discussions, we want to spark intellectual thought, spiritual growth and a desire to follow the command of Colossians 2:8: "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ."

YOUR STORIES


Family uses Plugged In as a ‘significant compass’

"I am at a loss for words to adequately express how much it means to my husband and me to know that there is an organization like Focus that is rooting for us. Just today I was reading Psalm 37 and thinking about how your ministry provides ways to 'dwell in the land and enjoy safe pasture.' We have two teenagers and an 8-year-old in our household...Plugged In has become a significant compass for our family. All three of our kids are dedicated to their walk with Christ but they still encounter challenges. Thanks for all of your research and persistence in helping us navigate through stormy waters."

Plugged In helps college student stand-up for his belief

"Thanks for the great job you do in posting movie and television reviews online. I’m a college freshman and I recently had a confrontational disagreement with my English professor regarding an R-rated film. It is her favorite movie and she wanted to show it in class. I went to your Web site to research the film’s content. Although I had not seen the movie myself, I was able to make an educated argument against it based on the concerns you outlined. The prof said that she was impressed by my stand and decided to poll the whole class and give us a choice. We overwhelmingly voted to watch a G-rated movie instead! I’ve learned that I can trust your site and I will be using it a lot in the future.”

Plugged In brings ‘Sanity and Order’ to Non-believer

“Even though I don’t consider myself a Christian, I find your Plugged In Web site useful and thought-provoking. No one reviews movies like you do. Instead of being judgmental, you put entertainment ‘on trial.’ After presenting the evidence, you allow the jury of your readers to decide for themselves what they should do. In my opinion, you bring sanity and order to the wild world of modern day entertainment. Keep up the good work!”

Mom thinks Plugged In is the ‘BEST Christian media review site’

"Our family doesn't go to the movies until we go online and check out your assessment of a given film. I think this is the BEST Christian media review website that I've found, and I recommend it to my family and friends. Keep up the good work!"

SUPPORT THE WORK OF PLUGGED IN

Our hope is that whether you're a parent, youth leader or teen, the information and tools at Plugged In will help you and your family make appropriate media decisions. We are privileged to do the work we do, and are continually thankful for the generosity and support from you, our loyal readers, listeners and friends.

PLUGGED IN RATING

    No Rating Available

Watch This Review

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Movie Review

During the Gulf War in 1991, a U.S. Army patrol is ambushed and faces extinction save for the heroics of one soldier: Sgt. Raymond Prentiss Shaw. That feat earns him the Medal of Honor. Part of a wealthy and politically connected family, Shaw goes on to become a congressman. From that position, his manipulative mother manages to force him onto the vice-presidential ticket for an upcoming election.

The rest of Shaw's unit doesn't fare so well. Years later, the survivors suffer from a variety of psychological disorders that include bizarre, frightening dreams. The patrol’s commanding officer, Ben Marco, fears he’s losing his mind until he chances upon another member of that so-called “Lost Patrol,” who describes his dreams. They’re the same dreams Marco suffers from. The two also use the exact same words to describe Shaw. Wondering if someone is messing with his head, Marco starts investigating the circumstances of that long-ago battle in the desert. (He’d been knocked unconscious early in the fight.) For some reason he can’t shake the feeling that things did not happen quite as he seems to remember them.

Perhaps the key to the mystery lies with Raymond Shaw. Perhaps it’s to be found in the corridors of a secretive multinational company called Manchurian Global, which has financed Shaw’s political campaigns. Or maybe Marco really is crazy. Thus unfolds a tortuous plot where no one can be trusted and things are often not as they first appear.

Advertisement

Positive Elements

Ben Marco is a dedicated military officer, and despite veiled threats and fearing for his sanity, he continues to search for the truth. A federal law enforcement officer puts her life in jeopardy to help him. A man deliberately puts himself in the line of fire, effectively sacrificing himself, to end a greater evil.

Spiritual Content

A woman scolds a man by saying, “Your god is money.” A political candidate is briefly shown in front of a church.

Sexual Content

Shaw's mom gives him an affectionate kiss on the lips, and then she gives him a look that seems to imply that there’s more between them than a mother-son bond. Marco is seen showering (from the waist up).

Violent Content

A battlefield ambush is shown in several quick cuts of men firing rifles and machine guns. During the fight an ambusher is shot just before he can launch a rocket-propelled grenade, and an Iraqi helicopter is shot down.

A man reduced to insanity lives in a filthy apartment, the walls of which are covered with bizarre and disturbing drawings, including one of a man being shot in the head. He carries a notebook full of similar drawings. Marco hallucinates a bullet hole appearing on a woman’s forehead with blood dripping out.

[Spoiler Warning] Worse, in a psychotic dream Marco sees himself executing a fellow soldier by shooting him in the forehead. He sees another soldier strangling a comrade, who vomits as he dies. In another flashback/dream sequence, a man is suffocated by having a plastic sheet held over his face. Two people are shot dead through the chest. Two others are murdered by drowning; we see their faces contorted in pain as they struggle for air. Indeed, in every one of these murder sequences, the camera refuses to blink or pull away.

Also, a decaying body is pulled from a river. A man is punched square in the face, bloodying his nose. Marco uses a pocketknife to dig a metal implant out of his shoulder muscle. He later attacks another man and bites that portion of his shoulder, drawing quite a bit of blood. Marco receives electroshock therapy, which causes his body to convulse.

Crude or Profane Language

One f-word. The s-word is used about six times. A few milder vulgarities include "h---," "a--" and "d--n." God’s name is abused at least a half-dozen times (several times it's combined with "d--n"). Jesus’ name is exclaimed once. Soldiers exchange coarse insults, but most of it is unintelligible over the loud music.

Drug and Alcohol Content

A few men smoke cigarettes or cigars. Marco is injected with a narcotic before being given electroshock therapy. A man consumes prodigious amounts of No-Doze.

Other Negative Elements

In an excruciating scene, a man has a hole drilled into his skull. The “good guys” cover up a criminal plot by falsifying evidence. Soldiers gamble over cards.

Conclusion

This remake of 1962’s The Manchurian Candidate artfully plucks the tangled strings of paranoia, not just with a capital P, but also capitals A, R, A, N, O, I and A. With an exclamation point. It succeeds in portraying characters who are not sure they can believe what they “know”—and neither can the audience.

The original version, which stared Frank Sinatra and Angela Lansbury, was based on a 1959 Cold War novel by Richard Condon. It was very much a product of its time. The overriding theme was the Communist menace combined with paranoia left over from the McCarthy era and the Korean War. That war introduced a concept called “brainwashing,” with which the Chinese communists were supposedly able to completely cleanse a man’s mind of certain ideas—love of country, for example—and replace them with sinister instructions that could be activated by a simple command. These so called “sleeper agents” could be anywhere and everywhere. (The theory is psychologically suspect today.)

This 2004 film is also very much a product of its time—for a certain segment of the political spectrum, that is. It has replaced fear of Communism, a demonstrated evil, with fear of multinational corporations. For that reason, there’s little overall menace in this film. I’m sorry, but I just can’t get all worked up about Wal-Mart’s expansion into Central America or a U.S. investment firm with offices all over the world. I lived through part of the Red Scare, and it was, well, scarier. And to be honest, the supposedly sinister Manchurian Global plays a very small role in this movie, serving mainly to allow the filmmakers to use the same title.

That doesn't diminish the movie's taut plot and the paranoid sense of uncertainty felt by the main character. It has enough blind alleys and tantalizing twists to keep viewers on the edges of their seats and uncertain until the very end. What does diminish it is the graphic—sometimes gratuitous—violence and spatterings of crude language that'll force most families to vote against this candidate at the box office.

Pro-social Content

Objectionable Content

Summary Advisory

Plot Summary

Christian Beliefs

Other Belief Systems

Authority Roles

Profanity/Violence

Kissing/Sex/Homosexuality

Discussion Topics

Additional Comments/Notes

Episode Reviews

Credits

Rating

R

Readability Age Range

Author

Cast

Denzel Washington as Maj. Ben Marco; Meryl Streep as Sen. Eleanor Shaw; Liev Schreiber as Raymond Prentiss Shaw; Kimberly Elise as Rosie; Jon Voight as Sen. Thomas Jordan; Jeffrey Wright as Cpl. Al Melvin

Distributor

Paramount Pictures

Network

Performance

Record Label

Platform

Publisher

In Theaters

On Video

Year Published

Awards

Reviewer

Tom Neven

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Get weekly e-news, Culture Clips & more!